Artwork removed from National Portrait Gallery after row over Churchill’s role in Bengal famine

Turner winner Helen Cammock withdraws piece after 50 peers criticise claim former PM ‘starved people’ An artwork by a Turner prize-winning artist has been removed from the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) after a row about the role Winston Churchill played in the 1943 Bengal famine. The Persistence video installation by 2019 Turner prize winner Helen Cammock was taken down on Monday after a week of criticism as pressure mounted on the gallery. Continue reading...

Source-feed image associated with the linked report: Artwork removed from National Portrait Gallery after row over Churchill’s role in Bengal famine.Credit: The Guardian Source-feed thumbnail displayed with attribution and outbound source link; VINI does not claim ownership or republish the third-party article body. Image source Cached source-feed image shown for continuity with attribution and an outbound source link; VINI does not claim third-party image authorship or republish the third-party article body.

Reading time1 min

coverage / Source report

Source file1 public source

Open source summary

Reader responseTechnology

Right of reply / send a tip

SupportDonate

Fund future reporting

Vinita Duniphin Technology Source report

What happened

According to The Guardian’s source item, Artwork removed from National Portrait Gallery after row over Churchill’s role in Bengal famine, Turner winner Helen Cammock withdraws piece after 50 peers criticise claim former PM ‘starved people’ An artwork by a Turner prize-winning artist has been removed from the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) after a row about the role Winston Churchill played in the 1943 Bengal famine. The Persistence video installation by 2019 Turner prize winner Helen Cammock was taken down on Monday after a week of criticism as pressure mounted on the gallery. Continue reading…

Context

The development sits in VINI’s Technology file for readers following technology, science, product policy, markets, infrastructure, and the public consequences of innovation. The original report is linked so readers can check the source account, follow later updates, and compare new coverage against the first published record. The source item is dated 2026-06-23T08:30:01+00:00.

What to watch

Open questions include whether primary sources issue follow-up statements, whether local or market impacts become clearer, and whether additional reporting changes the timeline or adds material context.

Source

Primary source: Artwork removed from National Portrait Gallery after row over Churchill’s role in Bengal famine via The Guardian. VINI cites and links the source; it does not reproduce the publisher’s full article text without rights clearance.

This source-cited VINI report links to the original publisher record. VINI does not republish third-party article bodies without rights clearance. 1 source listed.

Reader comments

Moderated discussion

Account access

Comments are open to authenticated approved accounts, screened for spam and abuse, and published only after newsroom moderation unless editors change the story control.

Loading comments.